The concept of
'phase space' is a very powerful way of depicting the time-evolution of
dynamical systems. Imagine a system of N particles. At any instant of time, any
particle is at a particular point in space, so we can specify its location in
terms of three coordinates, say (x, y, z). At that time
the particle also has some momentum. The momentum, being a vector, can be specified
in terms of its three components, say (px, py,
pz). Thus six parameters (x, y, z, px,
py, pz) are needed to specify the position
and momentum of a particle at any instant of time. Therefore, for N particles, we need to specify 6N parameters for a complete description
of the system. For real systems like molecules in a gas, the number N can be very large, being typically of
the order of the Avogadro number (~1023).
So this is a
very messy, in fact impossible, way of depicting such a system graphically. The
concept of phase space solves this problem. Imagine a 6-dimensional 'hyperspace'
in which three of the axes are for specifying the position coordinates of a
particle, and the other three are for specifying the momentum components of the
same particle. In this space the position and momentum of a particle at any
instant of time can be represented by a single point. Similarly, for
representing simultaneously the configurations of N particles, we can imagine a 6N-dimensional
hyperspace (called phase space or state space). A point in this space represents the state of the
entire system of N particles at an
instant of time. As time progresses, this 'representative point' traces a
trajectory, called the phase-space
trajectory. Such a trajectory records the time-evolution of the dynamical system (in classical mechanics).
The figure
below illustrates this. In it I have introduced the simplification that, for
depiction purposes, all the position coordinates (3N in number) are given the generic symbol q, and only one axis is drawn to denote all the 3N axes. Similarly, all the 3N momentum components are given a
representative symbol p, and only one
axis is taken to represent all of them. In reality there are a total of 6N axes, 3N for the position components, and 3N for the momentum components.
Some
variations of the concept of such an imaginary phase space or state space are: representation space; search space; configuration space; solution
space; etc. The basic idea is the same. One imagines an appropriate number
of axes, one for each 'degree of freedom'.
Next, let us
consider a simple pendulum (a vertical string fixed at the top, and having a
weight attached to its lower end). Suppose I pull the weight horizontally by a
small distance x0 along
the x-axis, and then release it. The
weight starts performing an oscillatory motion around the point x = 0.
At the moment I released the weight it was at rest, so its momentum was zero,
and it had only potential energy. On releasing it the potential energy starts
decreasing as the weight moves towards the point x = 0, and its momentum
starts increasing. This goes on till the point x = 0 is reached. At this
moment the potential energy is zero (it got fully converted to kinetic energy
corresponding to the momentum -px).
Because of
this momentum, the weight now overshoots the point x = 0 and moves in
the opposite direction. When it has moved a distance -x0 it stops, having spent all its kinetic energy for
acquiring an equivalent amount of potential energy.
Then it starts
moving towards the point x = 0. At this point it has acquired the
maximum (but oppositely directed) momentum px.
And so on.
What is the
phase-space trajectory for this system? It is a circle in a plane defined by
the x-axis and the px-axis (Figure (a) below).
The weight successively and repeatedly passes through a whole continuum of
points in phase space, including the points (-x, 0), (0, px),
(x, 0), (0, -px).
If there is no
dissipation of energy, the phase-space trajectory in this experiment is a closed loop because the particle
repeatedly passes through all the allowed (i.e. energy-conserving)
position-momentum combinations again and again.
But in
reality, dissipative forces like friction are always present, and in due course
all the energy I expended in displacing the weight from its initial equilibrium
position will be dissipated as heat. As the total energy decreases, the maximum
value of the x-coordinate during the
trajectory cycle, as also the maximum value of px, would decrease, implying that the area enclosed by
the trajectory in phase space will progressively decrease, till the particle
finally comes to a state of rest or zero momentum.
This final
configuration corresponds to an ATTRACTOR in phase space: It is as if the
dissipative dynamics of the system is 'attracted' by the point (0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0) as the energy gets dissipated. Thus, because of the gradual dissipation of
energy, the phase-space trajectory spirals towards a state of zero area (Figure
(b) above).
This is like a
particle set rolling in a bowl, spiralling towards the bottom of the bowl; the
bowl thus acts as a basin of attraction.
The phase-space region around the attractor (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) is the basin of
attraction for the oscillator problem I have considered here.
In the above
experiment if I move the weight only by a small amount, the restorative force
is linearly proportional to the
displacement. If we plot this force fx
as a function of x, we get a straight
line (which is a linear curve).
But if the
displacement is too large, the restorative force is not linearly proportional
to the displacement x, and we are
then dealing with a NONLINEAR DYNAMICAL
SYSTEM. All complex systems are governed by nonlinear dynamics, and this
makes their detailed analytical investigation very difficult, if not impossible.
thank you. your explanation helped me.
ReplyDeleteI am so glad to learn that!
ReplyDeleteWell done. I like the clear explanation and the relationship of mapped phase spaces with genetics and phenotypes related to the search and problem spaces argument.
ReplyDeleteThank you!
Delete