The big
question is: How could the very long molecules like RNA and DNA get created on
their own? I begin answering this question by first introducing the basics of
molecular self-assembly and chemical evolution.
The lowering
of free energy at the atomic or molecular scale occurs as follows: If two atoms
are close to each other, they will bond together to form a molecule if the
molecule has a lower free energy than that of the two separate atoms.
Next, let us
consider the possible bonding among molecules
to form still larger assemblies (or ‘supramolecular aggregates’). Things get
more interesting now. The important concept of MOLECULAR RECOGNITION becomes operative here: Those types
of molecules are likely to form assemblies or aggregates which have a certain
degree of mutual complementarity.
There are two
types of complementarity to consider: That of lock-and-key-like shapes, and that of complementary charge distributions (remember, positive charge
attracts negative charge). These complementarities, if present, enable portions
of two molecules to fit snugly into each other, thus lowering the overall
potential energy, and thence the free energy, by a fairly large amount. This is
a more stable configuration because thermal fluctuations or other perturbations
are less likely to knock the snugly-fitting (and therefore more tightly bonded)
molecules apart. This is the essence of chemical
self-assembly in Nature.
Self-assembly
of supramolecular aggregates is like crystal growth, except that the end
product carries a lot more information; i.e., it is more complex.
The role of molecular complementarity was discovered by the Nobel Laureate Paul Ehrlich. As a student
he was working on the newly discovered aniline dyes, which he used for staining
biological cells. He found that each dye stained only a particular type of
tissue or a specific species of bacteria, and not others. What happens is that
the dye molecule moves around in the solution till it finds a 'binding site' nicely fitting (complementing) the shape of one of its side
chains, like a key fitting its own lock. For better binding the complementarity
of such a ‘lock’ and ‘key’ should be not only spatial, but also electrostatic;
otherwise the 'specificity' is not very strong: Not only the
two shapes should be complementary, even the regions of positive excess charge
on one molecule should be complementary to regions of negative excess charge on
the other molecule.
Here are some
examples of spatial and charge complementarity in Nature:
- The complementarity between the active site of an enzyme and the substrate of the enzyme.
- The well-known ‘base-pair complementarity’ between DNA strands (cf. Part 43).
- Self-assembly of viruses and subcellular organelles.
- Receptors located on the surface of cells only binding to a very limited number of substrates (often only one). The receptor is typically much more complicated (larger) than the substrate (hormone) that binds to it.
Let us remind ourselves
that supramolecular aggregates, normally formed under near-ambient conditions,
do not usually involve the strong covalent interaction. Instead, they are
governed by weak, i.e. noncovalent or secondary,
interactions (van der Waals; weak-Coulomb; hydrogen bond; hydrophobic; etc.). This
means two things:
(i) The
aggregates are stable if the ambient conditions do not change too much.
(ii) If the
conditions change, the bonds in a
supramolecular assembly at or near room temperature can get readily broken and
re-formed, until the system has found its new stable configuration. Near-reversibility of bonding is a very
important feature of self-assembly through molecular recognition.
Biological and
other 'soft' materials can self-assemble into a variety of shapes, and over a
whole range of length scales. There is usually some amount of water present,
and the most important factors mediating molecular self-assembly are the
hydrogen bond and the hydrophobic interaction.
We owe our lives to the hydrogen bond.
Life and its evolution depend on the hydrogen bond. This bond is much weaker than the
covalent bond, and yet strong enough to sustain self-assembled biological
structures, enabling them to withstand reasonably well the disintegrating
influences of thermal fluctuations and other perturbations. Hydrogen bonding,
and the associated hydrophobic interaction, has the right kind of strength to
enable superstructures to self-assemble without the need for irreversible chemical
reactions. And yet, under appropriate conditions, there is a strong element of
reversibility associated with these weak interactions, enabling the spontaneous
making and breaking of assemblies until the lowest-free-energy configurations
(lock-and-key arrangements) have been attained.
Incidentally,
self-assembly per se is a far more
ubiquitous phenomenon than just molecular self-assembly. Some examples are:
crystals; liquid crystals; bacterial colonies; beehives; ant colonies; schools
of fish; weather patterns; even galaxies.
Self-assembly
may be either static or dynamic. The former occurs in systems which are in
local or global equilibrium, and which do not dissipate energy (e.g. crystals).
Dynamic self-assembly is more relevant from the point of view of evolution of
complexity, and always involves dissipation of energy. Here are some examples:
oscillating and reaction-diffusion reactions; weather patterns; galaxies.
I conclude by
considering the example of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) to
illustrate the hazy, perhaps nonexistent,
line between life and nonlife. Any virus (including TMV) typically has an
RNA core and a protein coating. It is possible to separate these two components,
and purify and store them in the laboratory. At any later time the components
can be mixed and incubated, and the TMV gets reconstituted by self-assembly. The reconstituted TMV thus not only
comes back to ‘life,’ it can even reproduce itself if placed on a tobacco leaf!
Watch this video for an example of the importance of complementary molecular shapes.
Watch this video for an example of the importance of complementary molecular shapes.
Amazing!!!
ReplyDeleteFirst time I’ve really understood the edge between biology and chemistry.
//hazy, perhaps nonexistent, line between life and nonlife.//
Sir, you have mentioned ‘van der waals’, which I think is the QM realm.
//they are governed by weak, i.e. noncovalent or secondary, interactions (van der Waals; weak-Coulomb; hydrogen bond; hydrophobic; etc.).//
I read about the new discipline of ‘Quantum Biology’. Would you write about that in some future posts?
Thanks for this one. :-))
Yes, the van der Walls interaction has its origin in quantum-mechanical fluctuations, as I mentioned in one of my previous posts.
DeleteAll natural phenomena are governed by the laws of quantum mechanics. I do not know much about quantum biology. In fact, I do not know much even about classical biology! I am only a physicist. But since physics is the mother of all other sciences, we physicists tend to think that we have a right to speak about all natural phenomena!
Here are some useful URLs on quantum biology:
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/quantum_biology/
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110615/full/474272a.html